Skip to main content

Books!

By
I love books!

I know it's the New Year, but I stayed up past midnight and my kids woke up early. At the moment I despise the celebration surrounding New Years.

Back to books: The Hunger Games Trilogy. Everyone I've talked to who has read it have said that they simply could not put the books down. My experience was the same. The third book-WARNING SPOILER INFORMATION-was a bit of a shocker, however. The books center around these games in which 24 children are selected to compete in a game in which only one will survive. The first two books reminded me strongly of the games that were played back in Rome. What I mean is, I enjoyed reading them. Even though children were getting killed. I felt at a remove-the books didn't really affect me that much. Is that how the Roman crowds felt as they watched human beings destroy each other? It wasn't happening to them, it was happening to other people. It was fun, it was like a parade. Prime time entertainment.

In the third book, however, the author (Suzanne Collins) seems to swoop down for the kill, so to speak. Collins did a splendid job of mocking our reality t.v.-obsessed culture in the first two books, and then showed us what that need for entertainment and live-action could result in. The casual decisions that result in kids being murdered and being forced to kill become so much more real. I can't say I enjoyed reading the third book. I was forced in the Roman arena (to continue my previous example) and made to really see the people who were destined to die.

What is more sobering is that the stuff she wrote about? Really did happen. Gladiator, anyone? Or how about the early Christians (and I'm sure there were other groups similarly targeted) being tossed to the lions? What do you want to bet they let the children walk away while the crowd watched the parents being eaten? Much more fun to include the whole family. Human sacrifice. Genocide. At various points in history, these things were done for fun, for religion, for politics. In a culture that continually demands the latest in entertainment, is always seeking the latest thrill-what depths could we descend to?

So yeah. The Hunger Games. Recommended reading, although you may not see as much into it as I did. My one problem with it, and I know some people would not see this as a problem, was the lack of any mention of God or some sort of higher moral authority. There was no reason given why the practical application of Darwin's "survival of the fittest" theory shouldn't be applied. Frequently, leaders decided not to kill someone/someones because they would be eradicating their breeding, i.e. population, source. Of course, the worst of those leaders did end up dead, thereby indicating that their thinking was wrong. It just bothers me. Why did everyone fight to eradicate the Capitol (the bad people)? It seems obvious-killing children is wrong-but where did that idea come from? Of course, Collins could've just been trying to avoid religion, since she was already dealing with politics, and everyone knows religion and politics are the subjects you never mention at the dinner table:)

Next I'll try to read something light and fluffy. A book with a pink cover. No mass murderings.


Labels:

Comments

Dawn Janis said…
Becca I felt like I needed therapy after reading Mockingjay. I want to go back and reread it but I'm not in a place mentally for the anguish it caused me the first time.
January 2, 2011 at 7:46:00 PM MST
Beowulfa said…
@Dawn: I felt the same way, and got my therapy through writing about it:) If I ever gussy up enough courage I might try writing the author and congratulating her on doing an excellent job on such a tricky subject.
January 3, 2011 at 7:30:00 AM MST
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RAMBLY Political Responses.

By
Sub-Teach, On monday, I had about 80% of this written as a reply to your comment before I figured I should just drop it into a post. Yay for thought spam from simple commentary. To be clear: I'm not anti-our-current-president. I didn't like his solution for the recession(the bailout(which was started by our previous president)) but I'm certainly not blaming the recession on him. I understand that it was my dear party that thought you could spend AND cut taxes at the same time. I'm not really in favor of the way in which the other party wants to extend the tax cuts(cutting some and not others). I would rather we let all of the tax cuts expire and everyone equally paid a little bit more. BUT I'm really not happy with the idea that we can extend all of them when we are in record levels of national debt, which is what my party espouses. No our current president didn't have much time to fix the economy...and any good/harm he did probably won't be evident
4 comments
Read more ->>

A post!

By
So Beowulfa recieved the Burning Crusade as one of her many christmas presents. As a side note, she also recieved a picture of a chick with a pet lion. Sort of like Angharad. Anyways, we're poking Drenai characters in a "ooo that would be cool" kind of way. Since it was her birthday present and all... and if the characters were not BElf or Spacegoat then it wouldn't be using the present! So we're going to at least get them to 10. And BElf's are too... pretty in an ugly way. I don'ts like them. She doesn't like them(much?). I said Spacegoat. She quickly created a male drenai priest(this morning). We talked about it at lunch and she's going to make a paladin instead, I think. I slightly warned her off of priest because I've heard they solo about as well as a warrior heals. I'm.... undecided. We have warrior, paladin, mage, priest, shaman, hunter. I've been told I need to be something tankish. So mage and priest are gone. I'm definin
1 comment
Read more ->>

New Stuff

By
For those of you who are still following us I'd like to redirect you over to our new blog project, www.wordsremember.com . Damm and I have embarked on artistic and literary adventures and have even opened our own etsy shop which you can find here . Thanks!
Post a Comment
Read more ->>